by MOSES Publications | Aug 27, 2025 | Advocacy, RJAC Racial Justice for All Children, Schools, Youth, Schools, Education
EAG Creates Literacy Justice Coalition Wisconsin
By Judy Fitzgerald, Tracy Frank, and Shel Gross
For the past few years, the Education Advocacy Group (EAG) of the Racial Justice for All Children Task Force (RJAC) has focused on early literacy education and identifying students with dyslexia as high priority ways to narrow the school-to-prison pipeline. For decades, many children have not been taught with practices supported by what scientists have learned from the neuropsychological research on reading. Children not reading at grade level fall further and further behind as the material becomes more complex, and this can result in behavior issues, withdrawal, and/or emotional turmoil. A substantial portion of juvenile detainees are functionally illiterate, as are about 75% of incarcerated individuals, making it harder for them to take part in employment opportunities or civil society.
With this knowledge, MOSES took an official position in favor of Act 20, also known as the Right-to-Read Bill, which was signed into law by Gov. Evers on July 19, 2023. The position’s first two sentences have been the guideposts for the EAG’s work:
- MOSES treasures the education and well-being of all our citizens, but most especially our treasured children.
- MOSES believes that schools should be held accountable for teaching children to read.
Act 20 changed the way that Wisconsin children are taught to read, to align with reading science. It also changed the way that teachers are trained, requiring them to have completed an approved course in the linguistic foundations of reading. Literacy coaches are prescribed for the lowest performing districts. Screening tests are required three times a year for grades K5-3, and the results are to be communicated to the parents or guardians. If a student scores in the lowest 25%, a diagnostic assessment must be performed and a personalized reading plan (PRP) provided to the parents or guardians. An Early Literacy Curriculum Council (ELCC) was formed to choose the most effective curricula for districts to adopt, so that they could receive up to 50% reimbursement for their cost outlay. Importantly, the new law also requires districts to screen for dyslexia, if requested by a parent, guardian, or teacher.
Due to a legal dispute between the governor and the legislature, the roughly $50 million allotted for implementation of Act 20 was not released until July 2025. But now the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) will be able to hire literacy coaches, reimburse districts for curriculum purchases, and support teacher training.
The delay did not keep RJAC from advocating for the local adoption of Act 20 measures over the past two years. We met with school board members, administrators, and DPI staff to learn about implementation and to hold all parties accountable for it.
When several members of RJAC provided in-person testimony in the summer of 2023 in support of Act 20, seeds for important relationships with other state literacy advocates and organizations were planted. The EAG recognized that though these groups share an interest in improving early literacy education and preservice teacher training, they might not be familiar with each other’s work. While organizations need to focus on their own core missions, MOSES understands that “organized people” are key to developing our power to impact policy. This understanding led Tracy Frank to create a listserv of literacy advocates and organizations devoted to raising literacy rates in Wisconsin.
Tracy led the first virtual meeting of the Literacy Justice Coalition Wisconsin on July 17, 2025, to learn what everyone was already doing and to plot future direction. Early childhood education, increasing the supply of tutors, and monitoring implementation of Act 20 were identified as crucial parts of the equation. Several coalition members want to hold an event in the fall to raise public awareness of the literacy crisis. When future legislation or funding is needed, the Literacy Justice Coalition Wisconsin is now in place to communicate and coordinate advocacy. If you would like to be added to the listserve or to work on the fall event, email Tracy Frank at jtracyfrank@me.com.
This fall, as every year, there are multiple reasons why many children enter the new school year already behind. Though teachers now are better trained in more effective methods, they still have the stress of teaching students with a variety of reading levels and resources in one classroom. Trained volunteer literacy tutors lessen a teacher’s load by working one-on-one with the students in the bottom half who do not qualify for the services of the reading interventionist or special education teacher. An effective, trained volunteer literacy tutor can help change the trajectory of a young person’s life, away from the illiteracy-to-prison pipeline.
While MOSES is primarily an advocacy organization, we know many members of MOSES member congregations are moved to provide direct service in a variety of ways. If that is you, check the sidebar and consider one of the many volunteer literacy tutor training opportunities in Madison.
Literacy Tutoring Opportunities
The following organizations provide training and placement for literacy tutors. We do not know the current status of training slots at each organization. If you would like to talk about tutoring in general please feel free to contact Judy Fitzgerald, judithfitzgerald@fsm.northwestern.edu or Tracy Frank, jtracyfrank@me.com.
Goodman Center – START Literacy Initiative
Iris Patterson: (608) 204-8014; ipatterson@goodmancenter.org
https://www.goodmancenter.org/children-teens/start-literacy
Children’s Dyslexia Center
Director Kelly Kuenzi: (608) 252-4922
https://www.childrensdyslexiacenters.org/services/
One City Schools: (608) 531-2128
Volunteer information here.
Note: Even though in-person tutor training took place in August, there are other ways to get involved if you are interested.
Schools of Hope: Madison
https://schoolsofhope.org/tutor/schools-of-hope-in-madison/
Schools of Hope provides tutors for:
Thoreau School – Madison
Fluency Tutor Program
(608) 204-6940
Lowell School – Madison
Literacy Tutor Program
(608) 204-6600
by MOSES Publications | May 21, 2025 | Children & Youth, MOSES activities, Restorative Justice, RJAC Racial Justice for All Children, Schools
By Shel Gross
On February 28, Barbie Jackson and Shel Gross were given the opportunity to have a table at the Madison Metropolitan School District’s Youth Restorative Justice (RJ) Summit. At that table, they invited youth to respond to this question: What do you want the community to know about RJ? Here’s what the youth said:
Youth (teens) are leaders and facilitators.
RJ helps with voicing opinions.
RJ is a very welcoming place!
RJ is a learning experience.
Everyone should be understood.
Everyone belongs in and with RJ.
RJ is a good way to work things out.
RJ provides a safe place.
RJ is about communication, not just about punishment and taking sides.
Resolving conflict peacefully is a very helpful and essential part of school.
There is no right or wrong way to contribute to restoring justice. If you show up and put in the work, self-reflect, and practice kindness, you are doing enough.
RJ is learning about yourself, to better understand the world around you and how it affects you.
RJ works not only to resolve conflict, but to create family and community.
RJ is not just confined to a room, but incorporated through every day and action.
Everyone should be respectful!
RJ is like family to me, and it is very transformative.
RJ is so cool!
RJ is about beliefs, mindsets, and values as much as it is about practice.
RJ can be different for everyone.
RJ includes all genders, races, and identities.
by MOSES Publications | May 21, 2025 | Restorative Justice, RJAC Racial Justice for All Children, Schools
By Shel Gross
In my career as a lobbyist, I learned that the road to policy approval can be long and circuitous. I can point to policy “wins” that were 15 years in the making. While it wasn’t quite that long, the odyssey that led to the Leadership Board’s approval of the Racial Justice for All Children Task Force issue paper on Restorative Justice and School Wellness put me in mind of those days. Different interests and efforts mixed and matched over a number of years, resulting in something really quite simple in the end: we could use our presence on the Madison Metropolitan School District (MMSD) Superintendent’s Wellness Advisory (SWA) to promote a variety of topics important to MOSES members.
We identified six interrelated topics to promote: community engagement; mental health staffing and practices; restorative justice staffing and practices; transparent communications regarding disciplinary practices and outcomes; recruitment and retention of staff of color; and staff training in research-based approaches to reducing exclusionary discipline and enhancing student well-being.
The first landmark along this road was a March 2021 MOSES Position Statement in support of a set of MMSD Safety and Security Recommendations (which was, of course, preceded by the work needed to bring this forward). Among the recommendations were a three- to five-year plan for holistic implementation of restorative justice (RJ) in the MMSD and creation of the SWA to involve MMSD staff (including new RJ coordinators), community partners, families, and students in developing a plan for enhancing youth and community roles regarding school safety.
These concerns found a MOSES home in RJAC, which had been formed the previous year. They also became of increasing importance, given the MMSD Board’s decision to remove School Resource Officers (SROs) from Madison high schools, as well as the impacts of the pandemic on student and staff well-being. But while RJAC members increasingly engaged with MMSD around these wellness concerns, they still lacked organizational structure and focus.
Another landmark was a listening session that RJAC convened in January 2024, to learn what MOSES members felt were important elements of school safety. This was a response, in part, to recognition that MOSES members were divided over the issue of SROs, but that “school safety” consisted of much more than the presence or absence of police in schools. Over 40 people attended, and we heard a wide range of concerns and ideas. While an RJAC subgroup was able to organize these into five main areas, the task force was not able to prioritize them; all of them felt important, but “all of them” felt like too much for the task force to take on.
The throughline for all this work was Barbie Jackson. Barbie had brought forward the earlier position statement and was asked to join the SWA in November 2023. In May 2024, she started pulling together some folks from MOSES and RJAC to support her work with the SWA. As the group started looking in more detail at the SWA’s ambitious agenda, we noted that many of the issues raised in our January 2024 listening session were among them. At that point, we recognized that the SWA had given us the opportunity to work on our wide range of concerns in a manageable way. The Leadership Board’s approval of the issue paper on Restorative Justice and School Wellness then gave Barbie – and the group working with her – the ability to bring all of MOSES into this advocacy work.
It is critical to underscore that this work is consistent with the MOSES mission of eradicating the systems of mass incarceration. Involvement in this system often begins in the schools. As the issue paper notes:
MOSES affirms restorative justice and other wellness-enhancing practices to create an inclusive culture and climate that increases well-being for all students and reduces behaviors that currently lead to exclusionary practices, such as suspensions, expulsions, and police calls. MOSES opposes exclusionary discipline in Madison’s schools. We seek new ways to respond, rather than persisting in exclusionary discipline practices that frequently are preliminaries to criminalization.
And because these exclusionary practices fall disproportionately on Black and Brown students, these efforts are also a critical part of addressing the racial disparities inherent in these systems. They clearly align with the RJAC mission to eradicate the childhood-to-school-to-prison pipeline.
Now the work of taking specific actions begins. RJAC members will deepen partnerships with those MMSD administrators directly involved in the six topics we selected, prioritizing those we hope to act on in the near term as our first step. Our continued relationship with the SWA will help us build partnerships and actions for change.
by MOSES Publications | Mar 1, 2025 | Advocacy, Featured, Housing, Information, RJAC Racial Justice for All Children, Schools, Yearbook
Racial Justice for All Children Task Force (RJAC) Had a Busy Year
In 2024, RJAC was active on a number of fronts, including developing new avenues for promoting racial justice for our youth.
Education Advocacy Group (EAG)
This group focused firmly on monitoring the implementation of new early learning literacy requirements as outlined in Wisconsin Act 20, for which RJAC had advocated in 2023. This advocacy took place on a number of fronts. With the Madison Metropolitan School District (MMSD), the EAG met twice with Gabi Bell, MMSD’s director of Literacy, Bi-literacy, and Humanities. MMSD had begun its pivot to a science-of-reading based literacy curriculum prior to the passage of Act 20. We learned the following:
- MMSD will continue using its current screener, as the Department of Public Instruction has not yet selected a required screener(s) as part of its Act 20 implementation.
- MMSD will create individual reading plans for students with low reading scores by January 2025. The outline of these individual plans will be available to the public soon.
- MMSD is working on support for families and tutors, and Ms. Bell will be connecting us with this team.
The proposed 2024-25 MMSD budget identified literacy as THE district priority and proposed funding 20 additional positions at the K-1 level to support this effort. The EAG facilitated an advocacy campaign with the MMSD Board regarding this proposal. RJAC Co-Chair Shel Gross presented in-person testimony at the June 24 Board of Education meeting, and six MOSES members sent written testimony, including MOSES President Saundra Brown. Saundra also met with new MMSD Superintendent Dr. Joe Gothard and described their meeting as inspiring and hopeful. She will be connecting the task force with Dr. Gothard, who said he appreciates MOSES’s advocacy work.
Early Literacy Curriculum Council (ELCC): Act 20 created the ELCC, which was charged with identifying curricula that meet the requirements of the law. Schools purchasing these curricula would be eligible for state grants to support part of the purchase price. The EAG connected to the ELCC through one of its members, whom we met through a parents’ advocacy group called Decoding Dyslexia. EAG member Judy Fitzgerald was also monitoring the work of the ELCC. The EAG successfully advocated for a shorter list of high quality curricula that the ELCC had identified, rather than the longer list of curricula put forward by the DPI that minimally met Act 20 requirements.
Sun Prairie Area School District (SPASD): Our April meeting featured a presentation by Lisa Goldsberry, Sun Prairie School District Board member (who recently resigned due to other district issues). Lisa spoke about concerns with the cultural content of the new Sun Prairie literacy curriculum; MOSES had sent a letter in March to SPASD leaders and board members regarding these same concerns. Lisa also told us about the changes that she and others had made regarding who should be part of the team addressing these concerns and how that work should be done. SPASD worked with the curriculum’s publisher, but it does not appear that the publisher plans to make any changes. Led by EAG Chair Tracy Frank, we advocated on a number of fronts for consideration of appropriate cultural content – especially as required by other state statutes, such as Act 31 – in selection of curricula eligible for grants.
Department of Public Instruction (DPI): At our November meeting, we welcomed Barb Novak, the head of Wisconsin Reads, which is the DPI office in charge of implementing Act 20. Her presentation put Act 20 in the larger context of the various education requirements that schools need to meet. She discussed Act 31, which requires an instructional program that provides understanding of human relations, particularly with regard to Native Americans, Black Americans, Hispanics, and Hmong and other Asian Americans. This was in response to concerns the EAG had raised about the SPASD curriculum. Barb also discussed the Wisconsin Standards for English Language Arts, which also encourage texts that reflect diverse experiences. Barb also talked about the DPI’s relationship with the ELCC, which she says has improved.
Coalition Building: Members of the EAG have done networking on a variety of fronts: attending the Wisconsin Association of School District Administrators (WASDA) meeting, participating in a literacy event at the Goodman Community Center, participating in the Wisconsin Reading League Conference, and meeting with the director of the Literacy Network.
Looking Ahead: A huge disappointment this year was the state Legislature’s failure to release the funds that were appropriated to defray school districts’ costs for purchasing approved Act 20 curricula and hiring literacy specialists through the DPI to support implementation. The EAG anticipates working with the Legislature on a “trailer bill” to address this failure, as well as the concerns about the curriculum content.
Housing Group
In 2023, the Housing Group (HG), along with other members of RJAC and MOSES, participated in a successful effort to have the state Supreme Court shorten the record retention period for eviction cases in which no money judgment is entered from 20 years to two. The HG monitored implementation of this rule change into 2024, when it was finalized with a modification to address a previously unidentified conflict with another state statute.
Through 2024, the HG continued to discern how best to respond to the wide variety of housing issues currently in play, including the challenges of advocacy for affordable housing in a market that is driving housing costs higher. Given the prominent failures in low-income housing developments that dominated 2023, we seek to stay informed and speak up as people in newer housing developments encounter chaos. The reorganized Education and Advocacy Committee of the Homeless Services Consortium has welcomed MOSES’ partnership in their efforts. In support of these goals, the HG engaged in the following in 2024:
- Met with Diana Shinall, director of the Salvation Army Family Shelter on Milwaukee Street, to learn about the services provided, people served, and regulations. Diana shared considerable information and extended an invitation for the HG members to tour the facilities at a later date.
- Met with Kennedy Elementary School Social Worker Bridget Cremin to discuss the impact of housing insecurity on Kennedy students. Kennedy has the highest number of housing-insecure youth in the district. She highlighted the severe housing situation in the area, including the troubled low-income Harmony, Meadowlands, and Ace apartments housing units; and the Salvation Army Family Shelter, which serves 35 families experiencing homelessness.
- HG members and others in RJAC submitted written and oral testimony to the MMSD Board in support of Kennedy Elementary becoming a Community School as part of the 2024-25 budget. This will allow them to receive more resources to support children and families.
- Learned about implementation of a $2.5-million grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development that was awarded to the Dane County Consortium of Care in partnership with Briarpatch. The program is designed to help communities support homeless youth, typically ranging from ages 12–24. Unlike many other HUD grants, the program requires that youth voices be heavily included throughout the planning and implementation stages.
In her role as Board member of the Homeless Services Consortium, Patti La Cross engaged the HG in the Dane County Homelessness Summit in November, part of “Homeless Awareness November” events. Both Patti and RJAC Chair Shel Gross attended the summit and reported back on potential advocacy options going forward. During the 2023-24 school year, 2,284 students experienced homelessness in Dane County, and it looks like that number will be exceeded in the current school year. Patti noted two connections between homelessness and incarceration: (1) that incarceration of an adult often contributes to their children experiencing homelessness, and (2) that the experience of homelessness, itself, increases the likelihood of criminal-legal system involvement. Increasing rents and other landlord requirements are contributing to this. Services to these families are not readily available in many areas of the county, and lack of transportation to get to services was a recurring theme. Financial literacy is important for our youth, and educating adults on the requirements for obtaining and maintaining housing is also needed. The HG will look at some potential advocacy opportunities arising from this event.
Restorative Justice and Wellness
Under the leadership of Barbie Jackson, RJAC is building on the restorative justice and school wellness work it engaged in during 2023. In January, RJAC collaborated with the Public Safety Task Force to hold a MOSES-wide gathering about school safety. The 39 people who attended shared their thoughts about the following question: What do you feel are the most important factors for creating safety for everyone in our schools, especially our Black students, who are more likely to be responded to in ways which lead them into the school-to-prison pipeline?
Responses fell broadly into five areas: increase youth community engagement; increase the number of teachers, administrators, and support staff with enhanced training; address life stressors such as lack of affordable housing and the behavioral impacts of these; use more informed interventions, e.g., social-emotional learning and nonviolent crisis intervention; and use school resource officers (which had both proponents and opponents). RJAC was unable to come to consensus on how to narrow down these issues. However, we noted that a number of the issues are being supported through the new superintendent’s Wellness Advisory Group. These are items that MMSD is already interested in, and we have a connection to that process through Barbie’s participation in that group. We agreed we would move forward by monitoring that advisory group and identifying key topics of interest for MOSES. A small group has been meeting, with the goal of creating an issue proposal.
As part of the MMSD budget advocacy in June, RJAC members also supported these two items related to restorative justice and wellness:
- Funding the MMSD Restorative Justice (RJ) project manager, whose federal funding lapsed at the end of June, and calling for funding at least one additional school-based RJ coordinator for Capital and Shabazz high schools. These two positions were not in the proposed budget.
- 10.4 additional FTE positions for mental-health support professionals.
Barbie and Shel continued to engage with MMSD RJ program staff and RJ coaches at some of the high schools. They were part of a Community Conversation about Restorative Justice in Our Schools event in April, which was co-sponsored by Freedom Inc. and Families for Justice. Attendees learned how RJ was rolling out in the four comprehensive high schools and had an opportunity to participate in circle practice similar to what is being implemented as part of this program.
RJAC was pleased to welcome MMSD Restorative Justice (RJ) Program Coordinator Kat Nichols and her colleague Lonna Stoltfus to the November general meeting to talk about and demonstrate how RJ is being implemented in the MMSD. There was interest in follow-up activities that we hope to report on moving forward.
Transitions
In 2024, we restructured RJAC’s meeting schedule. Instead of having the task force meeting and the two working group meetings all on different weeks, we combined all meetings into one, using a variety of experimental approaches to keep us actively engaged in each area of focus while increasing our synergies and efficiency in meeting schedules. The working groups alternate taking responsibility for a focus topic for the month in which the entire task force participates. We then have breakout time for each of the task force groups to address their specific issues and concerns. This has reduced the time demand of meetings but still allows us to move forward on our issues.
As they have assumed leadership roles in MOSES, Saundra Brown and Barbie Jackson have reduced their leadership roles in RJAC. Shel Gross transitioned into the task force co-chair and then into the chair role by the end of the year. Tracy Frank is chairing the EAG. We are grateful for the work that Saundra and Barbie did in developing the task force and leading it through its infancy.
by MOSES Publications | Nov 22, 2024 | Advocacy, Information, RJAC Racial Justice for All Children, Schools
Update on the Right to Read Bill (ACT 20)
By Shel Gross and Tracy Frank
The Racial Justice for All Children task force (RJAC), and specifically the Education Advocacy Group (EAG), has been learning that advocacy work requires time, long-term commitment, nuanced inspection, and connections. Over the past few years, a lot has happened in the state and in our local community in the area of reading. In Wisconsin, fewer than 40% of students are proficient in reading by the end of third grade, and Madison Metropolitan School District (MMSD) has been hovering around that 40% as well.
In the summer of 2023, EAG worked to support the adoption of legislation that is now called ACT 20. This article traces a bit of the progress, and also the lack of progress, related to ACT 20, which is otherwise known as the Right to Read bill. RJAC lead Shel Gross, a longtime registered lobbyist in Wisconsin, knew that while the signing of that bill on July 19, 2023, was significant, it was not the end of our advocacy work. The good news was that the MMSD was ahead of the law and had adopted a science of reading-based curriculum that met the requirements of ACT 20 a couple of years earlier. Other area districts, including Sun Prairie Area School District (SPASD), had not made the required changes, so work there had to be done quickly.
EAG was eager to do advocacy work to help implement the bill. This included advising on the hiring of a new UW-Madison School of Education dean, who will support the training required for new educators. It also involved connecting with Barb Novak, the new Department of Public Instruction (DPI) literacy director.
EAG has been in communication with both MMSD and SPASD to help ensure that they are following Act 20’s requirements for keeping parents informed and for developing personal reading plans for students who are not yet proficient in reading.
We kept a close eye on the work of the Early Literacy Curriculum Council (ELCC), which was charged with identifying literacy curriculum that would be eligible for state financial support, and we recognized their final approval of four comprehensive, knowledge-based curricula. However, while reviewing one of those curricula, Amplify CKLA, which was chosen by SPASD, EAG lead Tracy Frank and others living in the Sun Prairie community, as well as statewide Indigenous organizations, found serious concerns: that the knowledge-based components of the curriculum center history from a white male European perspective. When we asked the ELCC why this curriculum was approved, given these concerns, the ELCC reported that its criteria for approval did not include reviewing the content of the required knowledge components.
In response to the Sun Prairie community’s concerns, the district created a committee to review and modify the newly purchased curriculum. This work was deeper and more costly than expected, and many outside consultants were involved. In the past few years, SPASD has been in the news for concerns about curriculum violence (i.e., when the curriculum used causes harm) and discipline decisions that are harmful to Black and brown students. As a result, EAG has met with district leaders and voiced concerns in multiple position statements to the district.
Now, EAG, with support from MOSES, has gone back to DPI and the ELCC with concerns that the CKLA curriculum does not meet another law, ACT 31. This law relates to American Indian education and also states that school districts must provide adequate instructional materials which reflect the cultural diversity and pluralistic nature of American society. While we are not yet assured that the review of curricula will have increased standards, there may be a trailer bill in the next budget cycle that EAG can engage in. The concern about the knowledge-based components of the curriculum was not on our radar as this process began, but it is well within the scope of MOSES’s work, because it impacts students’ sense of belonging: Do they see themselves in the content of their studies?
In addition, since the approval of ACT 20, the $50 million promised for reading coaches and reimbursement to districts purchasing curricula from the ELCC list has been held up in lawsuits and politics. The Joint Finance Committee has not released the money to date, which is also a big area of concern.
At this time, EAG is eager to connect with parents in the community to help ensure that they are aware of the new expectations for personalized reading plans if their child is struggling. We are continuing our connection with the above school districts and all the statewide entities involved, as well as increasing our connections with other advocacy groups, so that we are prepared for future advocacy opportunities.
We are optimistic for improved reading proficiency in our state, while we also know that there is much work to be done. We are currently looking for more people to join MOSES’s Education Advocacy Group, so that we can continue engaging in immediate advocacy as well as be ready to have a larger impact as opportunities arise.
We encourage all within MOSES to know that while advocacy work is slow and the nuances can be very frustrating and confusing, there is good reason to stay strong, work together, and continue to press ahead with what will have the biggest impact. RJAC’s goal is to eradicate the school-to-prison pipeline, and we know that reading scores have a large impact on a student’s willingness to engage positively in the school environment. Keeping kids in the classroom and learning will help to keep them out of our prison system, and with that mission in mind, we march on together to a brighter future.
by MOSES Publications | Oct 30, 2024 | Advocacy, Information, RJAC Racial Justice for All Children, Schools
Update on the Right to Read Bill (ACT 20)
By Shel Gross and Tracy Frank
The Racial Justice for All Children committee (RJAC), and specifically the Education Advocacy Group (EAG), has been learning that advocacy work requires time, long-term commitment, nuanced inspection, and connections. Over the past few years, a lot has happened in the state and in our local community in the area of reading. In Wisconsin, fewer than 40% of students are proficient in reading by the end of third grade, and Madison Metropolitan School District (MMSD) has been hovering around that 40% as well.
In the summer of 2023, EAG worked to support the adoption of legislation that is now called ACT 20. This article traces a bit of the progress, and also the lack of progress, related to ACT 20, which is otherwise known as the Right to Read bill. RJAC lead Shel Gross, a longtime registered lobbyist in Wisconsin, knew that while the signing of that bill on July 19, 2023, was significant, it was not the end of our advocacy work. The good news was that the MMSD was ahead of the law and had adopted a science of reading-based curriculum that met the requirements of ACT 20 a couple of years earlier. Other area districts, including Sun Prairie Area School District (SPASD), had not made the required changes, so work there had to be done quickly.
EAG was eager to do advocacy work to help implement the bill. This included advising on the hiring of a new UW-Madison School of Education dean, who will support the training required for new educators. It also involved connecting with Barb Novak, the new Department of Public Instruction (DPI) literacy director.
EAG has been in communication with both MMSD and SPASD to help ensure that they are following Act 20’s requirements for keeping parents informed and for developing personal reading plans for students who are not yet proficient in reading.
We kept a close eye on the work of the Early Literacy Curriculum Council (ELCC), which was charged with identifying literacy curriculum that would be eligible for state financial support, and we recognized their final approval of four comprehensive, knowledge-based curricula. However, while reviewing one of those curricula, Amplify CKLA, which was chosen by SPASD, EAG lead Tracy Frank and others living in the Sun Prairie community, as well as statewide Indigenous organizations, found serious concerns: that the knowledge-based components of the curriculum center history from a white male European perspective. When we asked the ELCC why this curriculum was approved, given these concerns, the ELCC reported that its criteria for approval did not include reviewing the content of the required knowledge components.
In response to the Sun Prairie community’s concerns, the district created a committee to review and modify the newly purchased curriculum. This work was deeper and more costly than expected, and many outside consultants were involved. In the past few years, SPASD has been in the news for concerns about curriculum violence (i.e., when the curriculum used causes harm) and discipline decisions that are harmful to Black and brown students. As a result, EAG has met with district leaders and voiced concerns in multiple position statements to the district.
Now, EAG, with support from MOSES, has gone back to DPI and the ELCC with concerns that the CKLA curriculum does not meet another law, ACT 31. This law relates to American Indian education and also states that school districts must provide adequate instructional materials which reflect the cultural diversity and pluralistic nature of American society. While we are not yet assured that the review of curricula will have increased standards, there may be a trailer bill in the next budget cycle that EAG can engage in. The concern about the knowledge-based components of the curriculum was not on our radar as this process began, but it is well within the scope of MOSES’s work, because it impacts students’ sense of belonging: Do they see themselves in the content of their studies?
In addition, since the approval of ACT 20, the $50 million promised for reading coaches and reimbursement to districts purchasing curricula from the ELCC list has been held up in lawsuits and politics. The Joint Finance Committee has not released the money to date, which is also a big area of concern.
At this time, EAG is eager to connect with parents in the community to help ensure that they are aware of the new expectations for personalized reading plans if their child is struggling. We are continuing our connection with the above school districts and all the statewide entities involved, as well as increasing our connections with other advocacy groups, so that we are prepared for future advocacy opportunities.
We are optimistic for improved reading proficiency in our state, while we also know that there is much work to be done. We are currently looking for more people to join MOSES’s Education Advocacy Group, so that we can continue engaging in immediate advocacy as well as be ready to have a larger impact as opportunities arise.
We encourage all within MOSES to know that while advocacy work is slow and the nuances can be very frustrating and confusing, there is good reason to stay strong, work together, and continue to press ahead with what will have the biggest impact. RJAC’s goal is to eradicate the school-to-prison pipeline, and we know that reading scores have a large impact on a student’s willingness to engage positively in the school environment. Keeping kids in the classroom and learning will help to keep them out of our prison system, and with that mission in mind, we march on together to a brighter future.