Madison Organizing in Strength, Equity, and Solidarity
for Criminal Legal System Reform

MOSES in Action around Police Oversight

MOSES In Action

Rachel Kincade

 

MOSES has officially supported police oversight including the OIPM and the PCOB since September 28, 2025. (Link to official statement) Since then, we have testified in favor of full funding and against any attempts to weaken police oversight.

 

Police oversight in Madison is concentrated in two bodies: 1) the Office of the Independent Police Monitor (OIPM) which investigates cases of potential police misconduct, reviews the Madison Police Standard Operating Procedures, looks at statistical data on police practices, and issues reports. 2) The Police Community Oversight Board (PCOB) which hires and supervises the Independent Police Monitor.

 

An alder, who is no longer with the council, presented amendments that would take away the Independence of the OIPM and make it a city entity. The Council had reduced their already scant budget, reducing the time of the data analyst (while the police department hired two more data analysist), and without a case manager.  MOSES members organized. Members of our Justice Reform Initiative (JSRI) and the Justice and Policing Task Force (JPTF) came together to work on this issue.

 

We all met and under William Park-Sutherland’s leadership and created a full history of the PCOB and the OIPM all the way to what is happening now. We provided members with calls to action. It was very informative and the presentation went smoothly with Mary Anglim and Eric Howland doing the background – how and why it was formed. They showed the many years it took to get this ordinance in place.

 

Eric also covered the budget and how it has steadily been cut. Jeanie Vershay and I talked about where things were at now and provided a call to action.  In December 2025 the PCOB hired a new Independent Police Monitor (IPM), Aeiramique (Meeka) Glass. She is an experienced police monitor and has brought new life to Madison police oversight. Recent publications from the OIPM, starting with two statistical studies in their annual report and now two high profile investigative reports on police cases have challenged Madison’s views of its police department and also brought criticism of police oversight.

 

Aeiramique Glass is doing her job in a powerful way. I was on the PCOB for the first four years. In my opinion, she is doing exactly what the original ordinance calls for and is extremely effective. William brought it home by talking about the ordinance changes and the need to support the PCOB and OIPM. He acknowledged that Madison has the best ordinance in the nation, because it holds the super power of subpoena. Kathy Luker shared a way to get congregations involved, another great call to action.  Other calls to action include calling your alder and expressing the need for the original ordinance and a call to the mayor asking for full funding for at least 1% of the Madison police departments budget to bring the data analyst to full time, hire a case manager and more money for independent council.

 

A call to action came out for attending and speaking at a PCOB full board meeting on short notice. Our President made a statement of MOSES’ support; Eric spoke passionately about the power the police have and the need for a fully funded OIPM. I asked them to just hire IM Glass as the permanent IM. Barbie supported the ordinance. Jeanie summed it all up by talking about the death of Richard Lee Johnson in police custody and stated this was a call to action.

 

I’ll leave you with another MOSES Call to Action:  MOSES is preparing to testify at the Madison Common Council meeting on August 4th. At that meeting several amendments to the statutes that govern police oversight will be considered.  Several amendments have already been proposed to weaken police oversight. Where we stand: Keep the interim IM as permanent, fully fund the OIPM, and keep the original ordinance.

 

This is how MOSES takes Action.

Interview with Expert on Independent Police Monitors

MOSES and its Justice and Policing Task Force support the Independent Police Monitor and the Citizen Police Oversight Board (PCOB) as they are undergoing transition after the recent resignation of the Independent Monitor. The MOSES co-sponsored a Zoom interview organized by the Community Response Team with experienced Independent Monitor Joseph Lipari. He discussed the qualifications needed for an Independent Monitor and best practices for having an effective IM.

Here is a link to a recording of this conversation.

Communications Team Seeks Members

Want to help spread the news about all the great things happening in MOSES? 

Join the MOSES Communications Team! 

 We work behind the scenes to help MOSES members carry out their work of ending mass incarceration and mass supervision and eradicating the racial disparities in our community that contribute to them. We do this through a bi-monthly newsletter and an annual yearbook.

 People who serve on the newsletter/yearbook team enjoy writing, keeping people informed, and working with a small group to accomplish this task. The skills we have as a group include writing, editing, proof-reading, recruiting other writers, and keeping track of what’s going on in the community. 

 We also want to amplify our presence on social media platforms – Twitter, Facebook, X, and You Tube. We’re looking for people skilled in using social media who want to help with our mission.

 If you think you might be interested in joining the newsletter group or the social media group, get in touch with Margaret Irwin at mbirwin@charter.net .

Restorative Justice in Madison Schools

Restorative Justice in Madison Schools

By Barbie Jackson

 

The Madison Metropolitan School District (MMSD), like many other districts, is striving to provide the best possible responses to behavioral challenges in the schools. One method is Restorative Justice, which is emerging as a way to create inclusive environments where all children can thrive and where all are called to respond to harm by restoring wholeness to all involved.

 

Kat Nichols, MMSD’s restorative justice program manager, expresses it as follows:

 

Harming others is part of being human, and having the opportunity to say sorry, actively being in the healing process, is how we achieve communities of care, respect, and love where all kids thrive. These are the environments where children and adults can experience the safety and security they are striving for in their schools. Punitive approaches don’t correct the behavior. They just don’t work.

 

Restorative justice values all our precious children. It responds to harm by avoiding the impulse to punish and suspend, which causes more harm and fails to achieve correct behavior. Rather, restorative justice brings people back into supportive and inclusive relationships and promotes healing.

 

In MOSES, our Racial Justice for All Children task force (RJAC) is partnering with MMSD to support a robust implementation of restorative justice in the schools. This is one of several RJAC undertakings to disrupt the school-to-prison pipeline.

 

After the May 25, 2020, killing of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer, Madison’s Board of Education voted unanimously to eliminate School Resource Officers (SROs) – police officers under contract from the Madison Police Department – from Madison’s four high schools: East, West, Memorial, and La Follette. The board appointed an Ad Hoc Committee on Safety and Security to study and recommend a new approach in the high schools, which recommended a broad implementation of restorative justice. MOSES fully supported the recommendations and advocated MMSD budget support for four restorative justice coaches in the four high schools. That budget was approved, and the positions were established.

 

The transition from SROs to restorative justice was to begin in the 2020-’21 school year, but students were not in the buildings most of that year and thus this implementation was disrupted. And the 2021-’22 school year was rough; many students were significantly dysregulated due to the pandemic and isolation from their usual school and social environments. It was only in the last school year that the environment was conducive to rolling this project out and all restorative justice coordinator positions were filled.

 

In 2023, RJAC members decided to learn more about its current state of implementation and began collaborating with the providers. We met with Ericka Brown, a former restorative justice coordinator at East, to learn about her perspective and experience. We met with Rev. David Hart, special assistant to the superintendent, and Kat Nichols, who has been working with the district over the past academic year and is a dedicated and passionate supporter of restorative justice in the schools. After these two meetings, we formed a small team to continue our engagement, learning, and advocacy: Shel Gross, Peggy Larson, Nakia Wiley, and Barbie Jackson.

 

This team met again with Kat to discuss the current status in the high schools, as well as implementation of restorative justice in the elementary and middle schools. Kat supported connections between some of our team members and the restorative justice coaches at East and Memorial high schools and will provide further connections to senior administrators responsible for it. In October, Robin Lowney Lankton, a member of Families for Justice and Madison Friends Meeting, arranged for Kat and her colleague Lonna Stoltzfus to visit a Friends meeting to talk about restorative justice and to facilitate a restorative justice circle experience for participants. Shel and Barbie were among the attendees and recommend this powerful experience as something MOSES could consider for a future general meeting.

 

MMSD faces some challenges in continuing its rollout of restorative justice. Although there is a full-time restorative justice coordinator position at each high school, the person at West is on leave, so that position is not currently operational. Additional challenges include lack of staff time for training, insufficient funds to expand support, and multiple demands on scant financial and staff resources. Implementation of restorative justice is really a multiyear process, as it involves changing the culture of schools. It also involves individual teachers learning how to effectively use restorative conversations with their students and create community-building circles in their classrooms. Restorative justice will be more effective in a school that is also implementing trauma-informed care and social-emotional learning practices.This requires an extended focus on these issues – something MMSD has not always been able to do well, given the multiple, often conflicting demands that schools face.

 

Our restorative justice team intends to continue its discussions with school administrators, Board of Education members, and community partners with a historical perspective on the challenges of fully implementing restorative justice in the schools. Part of this includes making sure the community in general and parents in particular are aware of what MMSD is attempting to do and rallying support for it. We are hopeful that our engagement will help identify specific points where we can advocate steady support and growth of this important way of providing a welcoming, inclusive environment for all students and a disruption of exclusionary practices, such as suspensions and expulsions, which seriously contribute to the school-to-prison pipeline.