Call to Action: Dane County Budget
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
People who are in the community but still under supervision of the Dept of Corrections have to live by a number of rules dictated by their parole agent. If someone breaks one or more of those rules they can be sent back to prison (revoked) or sanctioned. In 2024 just under 30% of the people entering the prison system in 2024 were revoked without having been convicted of a new crime. Sanctions can take different forms. A sanction could be an increased frequency of visits to a parole officer, or an increased number of drug tests. Often a sanction will be incarceration in a jail.
In 2014 a bipartisan bill (Act 196) was passed to change the DOC sanctions policy. Following the lead of Hawaii and other states, the DOC was required to: 1) create and publish a standard set of sanctions for breaking the rules of supervision. 2) consider the impact of any sanctions on the job, housing and family of the person under supervision.
The Dept of Corrections has NOT implemented this law in the 11 years since it was passed. They define a short term sanction as any incarceration less than 90 days and do not consider the impact of the sanctions on the integration of the person into our communities.
A common saying is that everyone reentering society from incarceration has at least three major tasks: 1) Find work (legal money) 2) Find housing and 3) Develop a positive social network.
For someone in a low wage job even a week of incarceration is likely to make them lose their job and housing. It destroys whatever progress they have made integrating into our communities. That person has to start all over trying to find a productive way to live in our communities.
Before Aug 8th. We have a chance to influence the Dept of Corrections by submitting comments on their proposed rules:
Written comments will be accepted into the record and receive the same consideration as testimony presented at the hearing if they are received by August 8th, 2025.
Written comments can be mailed to the address written below or emailed to DOCAdministrativeRulesCommittee@wisconsin.gov.
Public comments can also be made at the Wisconsin State Legislature Website: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/code.
DOC Administrative Rules Committee
Caitlin Washburn,
Administrative Rules Coordinator
P.O. Box 7925
Madison, WI 53707-7925
https://www.riverwestradio.com/episode/expo-ex-prisoners-organizing-0323-about-act-196-and-more/
Tom Gilbert on Expo radio before the hearings (Transcript)
Tom Gilbert on Expo Radio after the hearings.
Background Information And Suggestions for Testimony and Comment on Proposed Rules
https://www.wpr.org/justice/swift-and-certain-aims-lower-recidivism-drug-addicts
Here is an article that Gil Halsted wrote and recorded in 2014 for Wisonsin Public Radio on Swift and Certain back when it was initially passed. It is mostly interesting because of how the law was viewed by the people who passed the legislation. You can see Gil was thinking of it as mostly for the treatment courts, probably because he interviewed Nygren.
Wisconsin Justice Initiative blog has something about act 196
https://www.riverwestradio.com/episode/expo-ex-prisoners-organizing-0323-about-act-196-and-more/ Tom Gilbert on Expo radio (Transcript)
WISDOM backgrounder https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:va6c2:bfd10cca-bebb-4f97-8455-82eb7dd75502?emci=1b9f08ca-d252-f011-8f7c-6045bdfe8e9c&emdi=665007be-d852-f011-8f7c-6045bdfe8e9c&ceid=22210
Ongoing Initiatives:
New Initiatives:
It is essential that a series of new initiatives get going in 2025 and receive sufficient attention and priority. These include:
Well I did not say the text was any better.
Let’s insert a random image.
This post is like drying paint.
But at least is is not sticky.